| |
|
Guiding Questions
|
What insights about our paternal grandparents Harold Sr.
and Hazel, and their children Harry Jr. and Betty Jean, can
we glean from Harold & Hazel's divorce papers and related
records? And come to think of it, what is Hazel's
ancestry? |
Evidence & Interpretations
.jpg)
None of us kids
ever had much of a clue about
our father's childhood
or youth. We had a vague notion that his parents had divorced
sometime in the dim and distant past, mainly
because our grandfather Harold Sr. was married for many years to a woman we called
Grandma Margaret, and Grandma Margaret was not our father's mother.
The woman we called Grandma Hazel was, and she wasn't dead.
(Left, Harold F. Schroeder Sr., ca. 1960;
right, Hazel, ca. 1973) |
Beyond that we knew nothing.
Now,
from the bowels of the Ramsey County Courthouse (actually the 6th floor,
but close enough), we present here Harold & Hazel's divorce papers,
along with related documents, from which we learn the following:
|
|
-
Harold & Hazel Schroeder
were married in
Duluth, St Louis Co MN, on 18 January 1923, and divorced in St
Paul, Ramsey Co MN on 24 April 1939
|
|
|
|
-
Harold Sr., age 44 and
employed as a postal clerk, was the plaintiff,
and
Hazel, age 34, the defendant. Harold was thus 28 years
old, and Hazel 19 when they were married
|
|
|
|
-
Harold Sr. received custody
of their two
children: Betty Jean, age 15, and
Harold Jr., who'd just turned 13
|
|
|
|
-
Harold Sr. also received all the property, including the family's house at 1411 Randolph Street in St Paul,
and all the furniture -- everything except a "wash machine," a
tea set, a breakfast set, an end table, a bridge lamp, a
telephone stand, and some dishes, which went to Hazel
|
|
|
|
-
Harold Sr. initiated the divorce proceedings because, as he alleged and the court agreed, Hazel deserted him and the children on 23 April 1937
-- exactly two years and one day before the divorce was finalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Hazel was awarded visitation rights, "at
least twice a month," and also the "right to have custody of the
children for two weeks out of each year during the summer
months," though whether she ever exercised those
rights is anyone's guess; our guess is that she never did
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
From other sources we
learn that on June 26, 1938 -- nearly a year before her divorce was finalized
-- Hazel bore a son:
Donald Edward Overwick; the boy's father was
Elmer Julius "Al" Overwick
(1914-1985; mother's maiden name Lee); soon after her divorce from Harold, Hazel married
Al Overwick and became Hazel Overwick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Donald Edward Overwick married
Leslie Ann Raiche,
with whom he had one child:
William Scott Overwick, b.
Feb 5, 1961; soon after he divorced Leslie Ann
and married Barbara
Jean Langer, with whom he had one child:
Wendy Jean Overwick,
b. Sept 8, 1968
|
|
|
|
-
Mary Lee Overwick married
Robert John Rudolphi,
with whom she had son
Robert Alan (b.
Sept 29, 1969) and daughters Angela Marie (b. June 25,
1972) and Melissa Jean Rudolphi
(b. Feb 22,
1975)
|
|
|
|
-
Hazel was born on Sept 18, 1903
on a farm in Douglas County, Wisconsin, and died
on May 26, 1996 in Anoka County,
Minnesota
|
|
In other words,
Harold Jr. had just
turned 11 when his mother walked out the door
and
never came back. When Harold Sr. petitioned the courts for a
divorce, Hazel did not challenge his claim for sole custody of their two
children. She did, however, ask for her tea set,
telephone stand, and dishes. Lacking marketable skills as far as
we know, she had doubtless gone to live with her
lover, Al Overwick, whose child she conceived some five months after
deserting her husband and children .
No wonder Harry found it so hard
to forge close emotional bonds with his own wife and kids. Having
your mother desert you at such a tender age is bound to create deep emotional
scars.
(Left: earliest photo of Harry Schroeder that we've seen, age 23, taken on his
wedding day, 19 Nov 1949. Right: Harry in Jan 1999, three
and a half years before his death in June 2002)
Harry's sister Betty Jean, on the
other hand, seems to have transcended her mother's desertion and other
childhood traumas, pouring her emotional energies into her husband
Cliff,
her three children Scott, Kathy, and Lisa, and her faith in God. We remember her as a warm, giving, and
loving person. Another illustration, perhaps, that our emotional
destiny is ultimately what we choose to make it.
(Left:
Betty Jean Schroeder Tedmon at her home in Sacramento, California, July
1969)
Regarding Hazel's death, Tom
remembers that sometime in the mid-1990s he was at Harry's office for
some business or other when he asked Harry about Hazel. "Oh,"
Harry responded casually, "she died about ten years I think," before
getting back to the business at hand.
In fact, as we've seen (and thanks
to the EagleEye and diligent research of Jean Morneau DeCoursey), Hazel
died in May 1996-- right around the same time her son was telling his
son that she'd been dead ten years, more or less.
Hazel's Ancestry
So, we ask ourselves,
who was this Hazel?
What was her birth surname?
What was her
ancestry? Where did her people come from?
Let's retrace the
path
we followed trying to answer these questions.
Hazel
& Harold's divorce
papers
told us the date of their marriage.
That led us to
their Ramsey Co MN marriage certificate
(
).
From this we learned that Hazel's name was
Hazel M. Amons, and that
Nell E. Amons
(her sister?) witnessed the 18 January 1923 wedding in
Duluth, Minnesota, along with
Robert Van Arman.
After a lot of
searching, Mike was able to find
these folks, and their family, in the 1920 census (
) in Superior, Wisconsin, a port city on Lake Superior just across the bay from Duluth.
Here's what the census data show:
|
Hazel
Amons.
Home in 1920 Superior
Ward 3, Douglass WI. Age 16. Born abt. 1904 in
Wisconsin. Granddaughter to head of household.
Father b. Germany. Mother b. Wisconsin. Marital
status single. Race white. Sex female.
Able to read and write. Household
members Sidney W. Vanarman
63,
Martha Vanarman
59 (wife),
John Vanarman
31 (son),
Fitch Vanarman
21 (son),
Robert Vanarman
16 (son),
Nellie Amans
18 (granddaughter),
Hazel Amans
16.
|
In this 1920 census, both Nellie
and Hazel are listed as "granddaughters" of
Sidney W.
Van Arman, while John,
Fitch, and Robert
are Sidney's sons. So, who were the parents of Nellie and Hazel?
Logic dictates that Nellie & Hazel's mother was one of Sidney & Martha's
daughters, who married a German immigrant named
Amans, and then either died or moved away,
leaving her daughters living with their grandparents. With this
information we can take things further back in time:
The 1910 census
(
) shows the same Van Arman family living in Superior,
WI -- without Hazel or Nellie, but with
Mabel Ammens (Amons), age 29 and married.
This Mabel must be Hazel's mother. Curiously, her
husband is not listed with her. Neither are her presumed
daughters, Nellie and Hazel.
|
1910 Census
Superior,
Douglas County, Wisconsin |
|
S W Vanarman |
59 |
|
Martha Vanarman |
49 |
|
Mable Ammens (married) |
29 |
|
Albert Vanarman |
26 |
|
Johnny Vanarman |
23 |
|
Arthur Vanarman |
17 |
|
Fitch Vanarman |
10 |
|
Robert Vanarman |
7 |
|
|
|
Where are Nellie and Hazel? Finding them in the 1910
census is crucial, since both were born after 1900.
Curiously, they cannot be found. Mike searched every
combination imaginable, with every permutation or corruption of "Amons,"
for "Hazel" and "Nellie" in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and
elsewhere, and failed to find either one.
Their absence
from the 1910 census
would seem to
suggest some kind of problem or
irregularity in these girls' family lives. Maybe
they were overlooked, but that seems unlikely. If they
lived with their mother, with the Van Armen family, why weren't they
counted with them? Even if they were temporarily out of
state with their father, the convention was to enumerate them
regardless of their presence when the census-taker came
around.
Where were Nellie and Hazel Amons
in 1910? Where did they live? Where was their father?
Who was he? Was he really German?
Taking things back ten more years to the 1900 census
(
), we
see the same family in Superior, Douglas County, Wisconsin. The
data confirm that Mabel was the eldest
daughter of Sidney and Martha Van Arman
and very probably the mother of
Nellie & Hazel:
|
1900 Census
Superior,
Douglas County, Wisconsin |
|
Sidney Van Arman (b. July 1855) |
44 |
|
Martha Van Arman (b. Sept 1860) |
39 |
|
Mable Van Arman (b. Oct 1882) |
17 |
|
Albert Van Arman (b. Aug 1884) |
15 |
|
John Van Arman (b. Jan 1888) |
12 |
|
Arthur Van Arman (b. Dec 1892) |
7 |
|
Jennie Van Arman (b. Apr
1895) |
5 |
|
Fitch Van Arman (b. Jan 1898) |
2 |
|
|
|
Let's summarize what we've learned thus far about Hazel's
ancestry:
-
Hazel Amons Schroeder
was born in Sept 1903 in
Wisconsin, probably in Douglas County, to mother
Mabel Van Arman Amons,
born Oct 1882 in WI, and an
unknown father Amons.
-
Hazel's maternal grandparents were
Sidney W. Van Arman &
Martha Van Arman.
So now let's try to trace the
ancestry of Hazel's maternal grandparents.
Sidney W. Van Arman
(Hazel's maternal grandfather)
-
1900 Census.
Sidney Van Arman, age 45, b. July 1855 in Wisconsin, both parents
b. New York. Wife Martha, b. Sept 1860 in Wisconsin, her father
b. England, mother b. Connecticut. Sidney & Martha started having kids in 1882
in Dane Co WI, with
Mabel their eldest.
-
1880 Census (
).
Sidney Van Arman, age 20, farm laborer in Burke, Dane Co WI, both
parents b. NY.
-
1870 Census
(
).
Sidney Van Arman, age 15, village of Mazomanie,
Dane Co WI, with father
John V. Van Arman,
age 39 (b. 1831 NY), "farming mill maker," his father born in the US;
and mother
Phylinda Van Armen,
age 33
(b. 1837 in Vermont), and his sister
Jennie,
age 7.
-
1860 Census (
). Sidney Vannorman, age 5, Cottage Grove, Dane Co WI, only child of
John Vannorman
(age 27, farm laborer, father b. US)
and Felinda
(age 23), and uncles
William (23) and
Joseph
(25). Another Vannorman family
two houses away: headed by
Hiram Vannorman
(age 39, stone mason), wife
Mary (30) and children
Sarah (14),
Jay (9), and
June (4).
Thus it appears that
Hiram (b. 1821),
John
(1833),
Joseph (1835), and
William Van Arman (1837) were
brothers and/or cousins, all recent migrants to Dane Co Wisconsin from New York,
probably arriving in the early 1850s.
Van Armans are thick on the ground
in NY state
in 1850; there are several possibilities for our brothers/cousins
Van Arman.
Sidney's mother
Felinda Van Arman,
b. VT
in 1837, might have been
Felinda Huntoon,
listed in the 1850 census as b. VT in 1838, living in Boston MA, only child of father
J. S. Huntoon (age 60, laborer, b. NH) and mother
Clarissa Huntoon (age 56, b. VT; she is the only person in the USA fitting Felinda
Van Arman's profile). There's a boatload of Huntoon's in New
Hampshire in 1850. Its ethnic origin is not yet known, though
it may be a variant of the English surname "Hunton" (though we
haven't yet confirmed Felinda's birth surname).
The name Van Arman
strongly suggests
Dutch heritage. The paternal side of the family traces
back to at least the late 1700s, suggesting that these people
had some pretty deep roots in the USA and, perhaps, British
North America. Remember how New York
City and the Lower Hudson River Valley used to be called "New
Netherland" until the English conquered it from Holland
in 1664? Remember that? Ever been to New Amsterdam
just
outside Albany NY? The Dutch in North America
go, like, way
back.
We have
Dutch ancestry???
So it seems, with Hazel's maternal grandpa Sidney.
Martha Van Arman
(Hazel's
maternal grandmother)
-
1900 Census.
Wife of Sidney, b. Sept 1860 in Wisconsin, father b. England,
mother b. Connecticut. First child daughter Mabel, b. 1882
in Dane Co WI.
-
Wisconsin Historical Society's online
vital records index:
Marriage
of
Martha A. Pollard
&
Sidney W. Vanaarman in Dane Co WI, 25
Sept 1881 (marriage ID 1805997). This jibes exactly with
what we know of the beginning of Martha's childbearing years
(eldest daughter Mabel b. Oct 1882). It's got to be her
-- which permits us, again, to go back in time:
-
1880 census (
). Martha A. Tallard (Pollard),
age 18, b. Wisconsin, living in Cottage Grove, Dane Co WI, "servant," living with father
George Tallard
(Pollard), age 50, b. 1830 in England, laborer; mother
Matilde Tallard (Pollard),
age 38, b. 1842 in NY, parents b. England; and four younger
siblings, all b. Wisconsin (Fred, 16; Frank, 12; Sarah, 9; and
Allie M., 6). Also in household George's mother
Sarah
Tallard (Pollard), age 79, b.
ca. 1800 in England. (Recall that Sidney Van Arman and his family lived in Cottage Grove,
Dane Co WI in 1860.)
-
1870 census (
). Martha A. Pollard,
age 9, b. Wisconsin; father George
Pollard (age 32, farm laborer, b. England); mother
Matilde (age 27, keeping house,
b. England); grandmother Sarah,
age 73; brothers Frederick, age 6, and
Franklin, age 2.
Thus the maternal line in
Hazel's family, beginning with her grandmother Martha and going back
into the mists of time, was apparently pure English.
The ethnic background of Hazel's mother
Mabel Van Arman was thus evidently
half English & half Dutch.
At this point we still didn't know anything
about Hazel's father Amons, other than he was born in
Germany, according to the 1920 census.
.jpg)
So we went back to the 1920
census
with the knowledge that Hazel's mother was named
Mabel Amons, and that she was
married to a German immigrant named Amons.
We finally found her and her husband
(
) living in Oakland Town, Douglas Co WI, with six children, born
between 1906 and 1919 (predictably, Hazel & Nellie are not among them,
since in 1920 they were living with their grandparents & uncles
in the City of Superior, as we've seen). Thus we
discovered Hazel's father's name:
1920 Census
Oakland Town,
Douglas County, Wisconsin
|
|
Amans, Edward, head |
49 |
farmer, b. Germany,
immigrated 1882, naturalized |
|
Amans, Mabel, wife |
36 |
b. WI, parents b. WI |
|
Amans, Edward G., son |
14 |
|
|
Amans, Harry, son |
8 |
|
|
Amans, Francis, son |
6 |
|
|
Amans, Lloyd, son |
5 |
|
|
Amans, Grace, daughter |
3 |
|
|
Amans,
Leslie, son |
1 |
|
How do we know this is the right
Mabel Amans? Because it jibes with the 1930 census,
which shows Mabel Amans divorced, with her parents, brothers,
and two of the same children
(Lloyd and Grace) as appeared ten years earlier:
1930 Census
Ward 3, Superior City, Douglas County,
Wisconsin
|
|
Van Arman, Martha A., head |
70 |
widowed |
|
Van Arman, John G., son |
42 |
single |
|
Van Arman, W. Fitch, son |
32 |
single |
|
Van Arman, Robert A., son |
27 |
single |
|
Amans, Mabel A., daughter |
47 |
divorced, first married age
21 |
|
Amans, Lloyd A., grandson |
15 |
father b. Germany |
|
Amans, Grace M, granddaughter |
13 |
father b. Germany |
|
Amans, Carol R., granddaughter |
9 |
father b. Germany |
|
Amans, Robert S., grandson |
11 |
father b. Germany |
Thus we discovered
that Hazel had
eight
siblings! Three sisters (Nellie,
Grace, & Carol) and
five
brothers (Edward G., Harry, Frances, Lloyd,
& Robert S.). Who knew?? Let's list these siblings in
their order of birth:
Children of Edward and Mabel Amons,
1901-1921, Douglas Co WI
|
|
Nellie E. Amons (f) |
b. |
1901 |
|
Hazel M. Amons (f) |
b. |
1903 |
|
Edward G. Amons (m) |
b. |
1906 |
|
Harry Amons (m) |
b. |
1912 |
|
Francis Amons (m) |
b. |
1914 |
|
Lloyd Amons (m) |
b. |
1915 |
|
Grace Amons (f) |
b. |
1917 |
|
Robert S. Amons (m) |
b.
|
1919 |
|
[Leslie Amons (m)
*
|
b.
|
1919] |
|
Carol Amons (f)
|
b. |
1921 |
*
Note: all of these children except
Leslie are listed in Mabel Amons' divorce
complaint of December 1922; thus Leslie must
have died between summer 1920 and December 1922,
leaving Hazel with eight siblings.
|
Mabel Van Arman must have married
Edward Amons
around 1901, the year of
Nellie's birth, and stayed married to him until 1920 or 1921 at
least, according to the data we've gathered so far. Her
divorce must've been between 1920 and 1930. So we inquired
with the Douglas County Clerk's Office, and sure enough her divorce
papers still exist.
They show that Mabel and Edward
were married on June 30, 1900, and that Mabel filed for divorce in
1922 alleging willful desertion, but never followed through with the
paperwork. Excerpts from her complaint for divorce are
reproduced after Hazel & Harold's divorce papers. Her
complaint lists these nine children (all except Leslie, as noted
above). It also offers an exact description of the parcel of
land that comprised the Amons farm. And, an interesting
version of Mabel's signature.
So it turns out that Hazel was
a farmer's daughter, the second of nine
siblings, and that her father deserted her family in 1920, just as
she was coming into adulthood. Soon after this she must have
moved to St Paul MN, where she met and married Harold Schroeder,
nine years her senior.
All of this is confirmed
in the Minnesota Historical Society's Death Index online, which
shows that she died on 26 May 1996 (Hazel M. Overwick, mother's maiden name
Van Arman,
b. 18 Sept 1903, d. 26 May 1996 in Anoka County, cert. no. 021009, record no. 2713029; the
Social Security Death Index says her last residence was Minneapolis, SSN
473-26-6755).
This means Hazel lived
to age 92, and almost outlived her son Harry, who died
in June 2002 at age 76.
For Hazel's sister
Nellie E. Omans
we find an online entry in the
Wisconsin Historical Society for a girl b. 5 Oct 1901 in Douglas Co
WI. So of course Mike sent in the $15 for her birth
certificate, from which he learned that the
baby girl's full name was Nellie Engelina Omans, born at
1 a.m. on Oct 5, 1901 in West Superior, Douglas Co WI, to father
Ed. Omans, a laborer born in Germany, and mother
Mabel
Veresman, born in Wisconsin. Nellie was their first
child. (The midwife's name was Mrs. A. Bakka, and the
birth was registered on Nov 5, 1901.)
(We would post an image
of the birth certificate here, but there's a red stamp on it that
warns that it is illegal to make this
document available to the public in electronic format,
which is enough to give pause, though why on Earth posting this public, non-copyrighted
document from the early years of the last century would be
illegal is quite beyond us. On the other hand the red stamp says nothing about
making portions of the document available to the public
in electronic format, and given our penchant for
pushing the boundaries of copyright law and fair use
doctrine at every opportunity (an idea
Google
stole from us!), we reproduce an electronic scan
of Nellie's full name below:)
.jpg)
From the birth certificate of Nellie
Engelina Omans, born 5 Oct 1901, birth registered 5 Nov 1901 in Douglas
County, WI, reel 56, record no. 199, Wisconsin Historical Society
There is no record
of Hazel's birth in Wisconsin,
at least that we could find after a thorough search of the Wisconsin
Historical Society online index, which has complete county records
up to 1907; there is an unnamed Amons, b. Douglas
Co 1907, and an unnamed Oman b. 26 June 1904,
which are the closest we could find (the latter might be Hazel, the
registration made 15 months or so after her birth). Nor is
there a record of her mother Mabel's marriage to Edward Amons, at least in Wisconsin. For some reason
-- maybe because they were farmers -- all these
events were flying under the vital statistics radar screen.
One thing seems clear
from all this: Hazel evidently had a pretty unstable childhood
and early family life. We do not know where she lived or who
raised her; we have no contemporaneous record of her until 1920,
when she's in her late teens and living with her sister, maternal
grandparents, and three uncles. Yet her family life was not
wholly dysfunctional; she was still part of her extended family, and she remained close enough to her
sister Nell and Uncle Robert for them to witness her
wedding in January 1923. That the wedding was held in
Duluth also suggests continuing family ties to the area.
Finally, we've opened up another can of worms with these Van Arman,
Pollard, and Amons ancestral lines. Who knows where those
will lead?

The best photo we have of Hazel Mae Schroeder Overwick, summer 1973, taken
by her son Harry Jr. at his home in St Paul; half a dozen such shots
were taken, seemingly from as far a distance as possible.
On the
right escorting Hazel through the backyard drink in hand, Diplomat Extraordinaire
Betty Schroeder)
These contexts established,
and bearing in mind what we've
learned about
Hazel's ancestry, family life, and early years, we turn to Harold & Hazel's depressing, redundant, and revealing divorce file.
(All documents
dated 24 April 1939)
The Documents
|
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF RAMSEY
DISTRICT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Harold F. Schroeder, Plaintiff,
vs.
Hazel M. Schroeder, Defendant.
DECREE
Pursuant to the Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment, made and entered herein on
the 24th day of April, 1939, and upon motion of Lewis E. Lohman,
attorney for the plaintiff.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
plaintiff be, and he is, hereby granted an absolute divorce from the
defendant, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between
plaintiff and defendant be, and they are, hereby in all things forever
dissolved.
1. It is further ordered that the
plaintiff, Harold F. Schroeder, is hereby awarded the custody of the two
minor children of the plaintiff and defendant, to-wit: Betty Jean
Schroeder, 15 years of age, and Harold F. Schroeder, Jr., 12 years of
age, with the right of reasonable visitation on the part of the
defendant at least twice a month, the defendant to notify the plaintiff
as to such times as she wishes to see and visit with the children, and
the further right to have the custody of the children for two weeks out
of each year during the summer months.
2. It is further ordered that the
present home of the plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein,
described as "Lot 28, Block 7, Lane's Manor Addition to the City of St.
Paul, also known as No. 1411 Randolph Street in said city", now held by
the said parties as joint tenants and not as tenants in common, is
hereby decreed and awarded to the plaintiff, and the defendant is
divested of all interest in said premises. In the event of sale of
said premises by the plaintiff, half of the proceeds of said sale are to
be placed in trust in the savings department of a regular bank in the
State of Minnesota in equal shares for said minor children for
distribution to said children at such times as they reach their
majority. If said children are minors at the time of said sale, or
in the event of the death of the plaintiff herein, said minor children
shall receive a fourth interest in said premises. In the event one
of said children precedes the plaintiff in death, then the survivor
shall receive a half interest in said premises.
3. It is further
ordered that all household furniture of the parties herein is hereby
decreed to the plaintiff except one wash machine, one tea set, one
breakfast set, one end table, one bridge lamp, one telephone stand, and
the personal dishes of the defendant, which personal property is decreed
and awarded to the defendant.
By the Court:
/s/ N. C. Robinson, Clerk of the
District Court
Approved as to form:
/s/ J ----- E. Michael
Dated at Saint Paul, Minnesota, this 24th day of April, 1939.
|
|
STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF RAMSEY
DISTRICT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Harold F. Schroeder, Plaintiff,
vs.
Hazel M. Schroeder, Defendant
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The above entitled matter, being on
the general term calendar of this Court, came on for trail before the
undersigned, one of the judges of said Court, without a jury, and was
heard on the 24th day of April, 1939.
Lewis E. Lohmann, Esq., appeared as attorney
for the plaintiff and there was no appearance by or on behalf of the
defendant save and except a stipulation on file herein.
The Court having heard all of the evidence
adduced by and on behalf of the plaintiff, and the Court having
jurisdiction of both the parties and of the subject matter of this
action, and being fully advised in the premises, makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the plaintiff and defendant
were married in the City of Duluth, County of St. Louis, State of
Minnesota, on the 18th day of January, 1923, and ever since that date
have been and now are husband and wife.
2. That the plaintiff's name is Harold
F. Schroeder, and that he is 44 years of age; that the defendant's name
is Hazel M. Schroeder and that she is 34 years of age.
3. That there is living as issue of
said marriage, two children, namely: Betty Jean Schroeder, 15
years of age, and Harold F. Schroeder, Jr., 12 years of age.
4. That the plaintiff has resided in
the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, for more than one year
immediately preceding the commencement of this action and the filing of
the complaint herein.
5. That on or about the 23rd day of
April, 1937, defendant willfully deserted the plaintiff and has ever
since said date and for more than one year immediately preceding the
commencement of this action, uninterruptedly continued said desertion
without cause on the part of this plaintiff.
6. That the parties have filed a
stipulation herein as follows:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the
parties to the above entitled action, subject to the approval of the
Court and such modifications as the Court may see fit to make,
1. That the
plaintiff, Harold F. Schroeder, shall be given the custody of the two
minor children of the plaintiff and defendant . . . [see DECREE,
no. 1, above]
2. That the present home of the
plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein, described as "Lot 28
. . ." [see DECREE, no. 2, above]
3. All household furniture . . . [see
DECREE, no. 3, above].
It is further stipulated and agreed that the
within may constitute the basis of an order to be made by the Court as
to the custody of the minor children of the parties herein, and as to a
property distribution," the terms of which the Court approves.
The Court finds as
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. That the plaintiff herein is
entitled to judgment awarding him an absolute divorce from the defendant
and forever dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff
and defendant.
2. That the plaintiff, Harold F.
Schroeder, shall be given the custody of the two minor children of the
plaintiff and defendant, to-wit: [see DECREE, no. 1, above].
3. That the present home of the
plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein, described as "Lot 28
. . . [see DECREE, no. 2, above].
4. All household furniture of the
parties herein . . . [see DECREE, no. 3, above].
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
/s/ James E. Michael, District Judge
Dated April 24, 1939
|
Supplementary
Documents:
Hazel's Mother's divorce
complaint
|
Divorce Complaint of
Mabel Emmons (Amons)
December 1922
STATE OF
WISCONSIN, SUPERIOR COURT, DOUGLAS COUNTY
Mabel
Emmons, Plaintiff
vs.
Edward
Emmons, Defendant
The above-named plaintiff by E. S. Geraldson, her
attorney, complains of the above named defendant and for
a cause of action alleges and shows to the court;
1. That the parties hereto were married on the
30th day of June, 1900, at Superior, Wisconsin, and ever
since have been and are now husband and wife.
2. That the plaintiff now is and for more than two
years next immediately preceding the commencement of
this action has been an actual bona-fide resident of
Douglas County, Wisconsin; ...
4. That the following children are issue of said
marriage, Nellie, aged 21, Hazel aged 19, Edward aged
17, Harry aged 12, Francis aged 10, Lloyed aged 8, Grace
aged 6, Robert aged 4, Carrol aged 2 years;
5. That although the plaintiff has always
conducted herself toward the defendant as a faithful and
obedient wife, the defendant disregarding his duties as
a husband, on or about the 4th day of December, 1920,
willfully deserted the plaintiff, and ever since said
time, and for more than one year preceding the
commencement of this action, uninterruptedly continued
said desertion without cause on the part of this
plaintiff;
6. That this plaintiff has no property of her own
but that she together with her children live on a farm
which farm is in the name of her husband and is
described as follows; the Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 47, Range 13,
Douglas County, Wisconsin; that at the time the
defendant deserted this plaintiff he also left some
personal property, which personal property and farm this
plaintiff has used for the support, care, maintenance
and education of the children of the parties hereto;
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment;
That the bonds of matrimony existing between the
plaintiff and the defendant be wholly dissolved;
That the plaintiff be adjudged such division of estate
for the support, care, maintenance and education of the
minor children of the parties hereto as the court shall
deem just and equitable;
That she have her costs and disbursements and for such
other and further relief as may be just and equitable.
/s/ E. S. Geraldson, Plaintiff's attorney
[Note:
The court was unable to serve the complaint and summons
on the defendant Edward Amons because they couldn't find
him in the state; the court then ordered the complaint
to be published in the Superior Telegram for six
consecutive weeks in late 1922 and early 1923. The
Superior County Clerk's office has no record of the
completion of this divorce action, suggesting that Mabel
never filed all the necessary papers, although the 1930
census shows her divorced.]

Above: signature of Mabel Amons; the divorce
papers spelled her name "Mabel Emmons," and
evidently she first signed her name "Mable Amons,"
then was told by her attorney that the documents all
spelled her name "Emmons" and she needed to change
it, so she did; from an affidavit testifying to the
truth of her divorce complaint, 27 November 1922.
|
Top of Page
|
|