Delehanty - Sullivan - Kinsman - Schroeder Family History Workspace

Home

Contents

Docs Home

People

 

Harold & Hazel Schroeder Divorce Papers

St. Paul MN, April 1939

with Notes on Hazel's Ancestry

 

 

Guiding Questions  •  Evidence & Interpretations  •  Hazel's Ancestry  •  hazel & harold's divorce papers  •  hazel's siblings  •  Hazel's mother's divorce papers  •  hazel on people page  •  h. f. schroeder sr. on people page  •  next chapter

 

 

 

Guiding Questions

 

What insights about our paternal grandparents Harold Sr. and Hazel, and their children Harry Jr. and Betty Jean, can we glean from Harold & Hazel's divorce papers and related records?  And come to think of it, what is Hazel's ancestry? 

 

Evidence & Interpretations

     None of us kids ever had much of a clue about our father's childhood or youth.  We had a vague notion that his parents had divorced sometime in the dim and distant past, mainly because our grandfather Harold Sr. was married for many years to a woman we called Grandma Margaret, and Grandma Margaret was not our father's mother.  The woman we called Grandma Hazel was, and she wasn't dead.  (Left, Harold F. Schroeder Sr., ca. 1960; right, Hazel, ca. 1973)

       Beyond that we knew nothing.  Now, from the bowels of the Ramsey County Courthouse (actually the 6th floor, but close enough), we present here Harold & Hazel's divorce papers, along with related documents, from which we learn the following:

 
  •   Harold & Hazel Schroeder were married in Duluth, St Louis Co MN, on 18 January 1923, and divorced in St Paul, Ramsey Co MN on 24 April 1939

 

 
  •   Harold Sr., age 44 and employed as a postal clerk, was the plaintiff, and Hazel, age 34, the defendant.  Harold was thus 28 years old, and Hazel 19 when they were married

 

 
  •   Harold Sr. received custody of their two children:  Betty Jean, age 15, and Harold Jr., who'd just turned 13

 

 
  •   Harold Sr. also received all the property, including the family's house at 1411 Randolph Street in St Paul, and all the furniture -- everything except a "wash machine," a tea set, a breakfast set, an end table, a bridge lamp, a telephone stand, and some dishes, which went to Hazel

 

 
  •   Harold Sr. initiated the divorce proceedings because, as he alleged and the court agreed, Hazel deserted him and the children on 23 April 1937 -- exactly two years and one day before the divorce was finalized

 

 
  •   Harold Jr. had just turned 11, and Betty Jean 13, when their mother left them and their father -- which may help to explain why Harry never talked about his mother or childhood

 

 
  •   From April 1937, this coming-of-age brother and sister probably had very little adult supervision. 

 
 
  •   This was one of those rare cases in which the courts awarded custody of the minor children to the father, not the mother

 

 
  •   Hazel was awarded visitation rights, "at least twice a month," and also the "right to have custody of the children for two weeks out of each year during the summer months," though whether she ever exercised those rights is anyone's guess; our guess is that she never did

 

 
  •   The divorce judgment also included provisions for the division of property, especially the house, in the event that Harold Sr. or one of the children died

 

 
  •   From other sources we learn that on June 26, 1938 -- nearly a year before her divorce was finalized -- Hazel bore a son:  Donald Edward Overwick; the boy's father was Elmer Julius "Al" Overwick (1914-1985; mother's maiden name Lee); soon after her divorce from Harold, Hazel married Al Overwick and became Hazel Overwick

 
 
  •   Hazel had one more child by Al:  Mary Lee Overwick, b. Oct 26, 1947

 
 
  •   Donald Edward Overwick married Leslie Ann Raiche, with whom he had one child:  William Scott Overwick, b. Feb 5, 1961; soon after he divorced Leslie Ann and married Barbara Jean Langer, with whom he had one child:  Wendy Jean Overwick, b. Sept 8, 1968

 
 
  •   Mary Lee Overwick married Robert John Rudolphi, with whom she had son Robert Alan (b. Sept 29, 1969) and daughters Angela Marie (b. June 25, 1972) and Melissa Jean Rudolphi (b.  Feb 22, 1975)

 
 
  •   Hazel was born on Sept 18, 1903 on a farm in Douglas County, Wisconsin, and died on May 26, 1996 in Anoka County, Minnesota

 

     In other words, Harold Jr. had just turned 11 when his mother walked out the door and never came back.  When Harold Sr. petitioned the courts for a divorce, Hazel did not challenge his claim for sole custody of their two children.  She did, however, ask for her tea set, telephone stand, and dishes.  Lacking marketable skills as far as we know, she had doubtless gone to live with her lover, Al Overwick, whose child she conceived some five months after deserting her husband and children.  No wonder Harry found it so hard to forge close emotional bonds with his own wife and kids.  Having your mother desert you at such a tender age is bound to create deep emotional scars.   (Left: earliest photo of Harry Schroeder that we've seen, age 23, taken on his wedding day, 19 Nov 1949.  Right: Harry in Jan 1999, three and a half years before his death in June 2002)  

     Harry's sister Betty Jean, on the other hand, seems to have transcended her mother's desertion and other childhood traumas, pouring her emotional energies into her husband Cliff, her three children Scott, Kathy, and Lisa, and her faith in God.  We remember her as a warm, giving, and loving person.  Another illustration, perhaps, that our emotional destiny is ultimately what we choose to make it.  (Left: Betty Jean Schroeder Tedmon at her home in Sacramento, California, July 1969)

     Regarding Hazel's death, Tom remembers that sometime in the mid-1990s he was at Harry's office for some business or other when he asked Harry about Hazel.  "Oh," Harry responded casually, "she died about ten years I think," before getting back to the business at hand.

     In fact, as we've seen (and thanks to the EagleEye and diligent research of Jean Morneau DeCoursey), Hazel died in May 1996-- right around the same time her son was telling his son that she'd been dead ten years, more or less.

 

Hazel's Ancestry

     So, we ask ourselves, who was this Hazel?  What was her birth surname?  What was her ancestry?  Where did her people come from?

     Let's retrace the path we followed trying to answer these questions.

      Hazel & Harold's divorce papers told us the date of their marriage.  That led us to their Ramsey Co MN marriage certificate ( ).  From this we learned that Hazel's name was Hazel M. Amons, and that Nell E. Amons (her sister?) witnessed the 18 January 1923 wedding in Duluth, Minnesota, along with Robert Van Arman.  

     After a lot of searching, Mike was able to find these folks, and their family, in the 1920 census ( ) in Superior, Wisconsin, a port city on Lake Superior just across the bay from Duluth.  Here's what the census data show:

 

Hazel Amons Home in 1920 Superior Ward 3, Douglass WI.  Age 16.  Born abt. 1904 in Wisconsin.  Granddaughter to head of household.  Father b. Germany.  Mother b. Wisconsin.  Marital status single.  Race white.  Sex female.  Able to read and write.  Household members Sidney W. Vanarman 63, Martha Vanarman 59 (wife), John Vanarman 31 (son), Fitch Vanarman 21 (son), Robert Vanarman 16 (son), Nellie Amans 18 (granddaughter), Hazel Amans 16.

 

 

    In this 1920 census, both Nellie and Hazel are listed as "granddaughters" of Sidney W. Van Arman, while John, Fitch, and Robert are Sidney's sons.  So, who were the parents of Nellie and Hazel?  Logic dictates that Nellie & Hazel's mother was one of Sidney & Martha's daughters, who married a German immigrant named Amans, and then either died or moved away, leaving her daughters living with their grandparents.  With this information we can take things further back in time:

     The 1910 census ( ) shows the same Van Arman family living in Superior, WI -- without Hazel or Nellie, but with Mabel Ammens (Amons), age 29 and married.  This Mabel must be Hazel's mother.  Curiously, her husband is not listed with her.  Neither are her presumed daughters, Nellie and Hazel.

1910 Census

Superior, Douglas County, Wisconsin

 

S W Vanarman

59

Martha Vanarman

49

Mable Ammens (married)

29

Albert Vanarman

26

Johnny Vanarman

23

Arthur Vanarman

17

Fitch Vanarman

10

Robert Vanarman

7
   

 

     Where are Nellie and Hazel?  Finding them in the 1910 census is crucial, since both were born after 1900.  Curiously, they cannot be found.  Mike searched every combination imaginable, with every permutation or corruption of "Amons," for "Hazel" and "Nellie" in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and elsewhere, and failed to find either one.

     Their absence from the 1910 census would seem to suggest some kind of problem or irregularity in these girls' family lives.  Maybe they were overlooked, but that seems unlikely.  If they lived with their mother, with the Van Armen family, why weren't they counted with them?  Even if they were temporarily out of state with their father, the convention was to enumerate them regardless of their presence when the census-taker came around. 

     Where were Nellie and Hazel Amons in 1910?  Where did they live?  Where was their father?  Who was he?  Was he really German?

     Taking things back ten more years to the 1900 census (   ), we see the same family in Superior, Douglas County, Wisconsin.  The data confirm that Mabel was the eldest daughter of Sidney and Martha Van Arman and very probably the mother of Nellie & Hazel:

1900 Census

Superior, Douglas County, Wisconsin

 

Sidney Van Arman  (b. July 1855)

44

Martha Van Arman  (b. Sept 1860)

39

Mable Van Arman  (b. Oct 1882)

17

Albert Van Arman  (b. Aug 1884)

15

John Van Arman (b. Jan 1888)

12

Arthur Van Arman  (b. Dec 1892)

7

Jennie Van Arman (b. Apr 1895)

5

Fitch Van Arman  (b. Jan 1898)

2
   

 

     Let's summarize what we've learned thus far about Hazel's ancestry:

  •      Hazel Amons Schroeder was born in Sept 1903 in Wisconsin, probably in Douglas County, to mother Mabel Van Arman Amons, born Oct 1882 in WI, and an unknown father Amons

  •      Hazel's maternal grandparents were Sidney W. Van Arman & Martha Van Arman

      So now let's try to trace the ancestry of Hazel's maternal grandparents.

Sidney W. Van Arman    (Hazel's maternal grandfather)

  •     1900 Census.  Sidney Van Arman, age 45, b. July 1855 in Wisconsin, both parents b. New York.  Wife Martha, b. Sept 1860 in Wisconsin, her father b. England, mother b. Connecticut.  Sidney & Martha started having kids in 1882 in Dane Co WI, with Mabel their eldest.

  •    1880 Census ( ).  Sidney Van Arman, age 20, farm laborer in Burke, Dane Co WI, both parents b. NY.

  •    1870 Census ( ).  Sidney Van Arman, age 15, village of Mazomanie, Dane Co WI, with father John V. Van Arman, age 39 (b. 1831 NY), "farming mill maker," his father born in the US; and mother Phylinda Van Armen, age 33 (b. 1837 in Vermont), and his sister Jennie, age 7.

  •    1860 Census ( ).  Sidney Vannorman, age 5, Cottage Grove, Dane Co WI, only child of John Vannorman (age 27, farm laborer, father b. US) and Felinda (age 23), and uncles William (23) and Joseph (25).  Another Vannorman family two houses away:  headed by Hiram Vannorman (age 39, stone mason), wife Mary (30) and children Sarah (14), Jay (9), and June (4). 

     Thus it appears that Hiram (b. 1821), John (1833), Joseph (1835), and William Van Arman (1837) were brothers and/or cousins, all recent migrants to Dane Co Wisconsin from New York, probably arriving in the early 1850s.

     Van Armans are thick on the ground in NY state in 1850; there are several possibilities for our brothers/cousins Van Arman.

     Sidney's mother Felinda Van Arman, b. VT in 1837, might have been Felinda Huntoon, listed in the 1850 census as b. VT in 1838, living in Boston MA, only child of father J. S. Huntoon (age 60, laborer, b. NH) and mother Clarissa Huntoon (age 56, b. VT; she is the only person in the USA fitting Felinda Van Arman's profile).  There's a boatload of Huntoon's in New Hampshire in 1850.  Its ethnic origin is not yet known, though it may be a variant of the English surname "Hunton" (though we haven't yet confirmed Felinda's birth surname).

     The name Van Arman strongly suggests Dutch heritage.  The paternal side of the family traces back to at least the late 1700s, suggesting that these people had some pretty deep roots in the USA and, perhaps, British North America.  Remember how New York City and the Lower Hudson River Valley used to be called "New Netherland" until the English conquered it from Holland in 1664?  Remember that?  Ever been to New Amsterdam just outside Albany NY?  The Dutch in North America go, like, way back.

     We have Dutch ancestry???  So it seems, with Hazel's maternal grandpa Sidney.

Martha Van Arman  (Hazel's maternal grandmother)

  •    1900 Census.   Wife of Sidney, b. Sept 1860 in Wisconsin, father b. England, mother b. Connecticut.  First child daughter Mabel, b. 1882 in Dane Co WI. 

  •    Wisconsin Historical Society's online vital records index:  Marriage of Martha A. Pollard & Sidney W. Vanaarman in Dane Co WI, 25 Sept 1881 (marriage ID 1805997).  This jibes exactly with what we know of the beginning of Martha's childbearing years (eldest daughter Mabel b. Oct 1882).  It's got to be her -- which permits us, again, to go back in time:

  •    1880 census ( ).  Martha A. Tallard (Pollard), age 18, b. Wisconsin, living in Cottage Grove, Dane Co WI, "servant," living with father George Tallard (Pollard), age 50, b. 1830 in England, laborer; mother Matilde Tallard (Pollard), age 38, b. 1842 in NY, parents b. England; and four younger siblings, all b. Wisconsin (Fred, 16; Frank, 12; Sarah, 9; and Allie M., 6).  Also in household George's mother Sarah Tallard (Pollard), age 79, b. ca. 1800 in England.  (Recall that Sidney Van Arman and his family lived in Cottage Grove, Dane Co WI in 1860.)

  •      1870 census ( ).  Martha A. Pollard, age 9, b. Wisconsin; father George Pollard (age 32, farm laborer, b. England); mother Matilde (age 27, keeping house, b. England); grandmother Sarah, age 73; brothers Frederick, age 6, and Franklin, age 2.

     Thus the maternal line in Hazel's family, beginning with her grandmother Martha and going back into the mists of time, was apparently pure English.

     The ethnic background of Hazel's mother Mabel Van Arman was thus evidently half English & half Dutch.

      At this point we still didn't know anything about Hazel's father Amons, other than he was born in Germany, according to the 1920 census.

     So we went back to the 1920 census with the knowledge that Hazel's mother was named Mabel Amons, and that she was married to a German immigrant named Amons.   We finally found her and her husband ( ) living in Oakland Town, Douglas Co WI, with six children, born between 1906 and 1919 (predictably, Hazel & Nellie are not among them, since in 1920 they were living with their grandparents & uncles in the City of Superior, as we've seen).  Thus we discovered Hazel's father's name:

1920 Census

Oakland Town, Douglas County, Wisconsin

Amans, Edward, head

49

farmer, b. Germany, immigrated 1882, naturalized

Amans, Mabel, wife

36

b. WI, parents b. WI

Amans, Edward G., son

14  

Amans, Harry, son

8  

Amans, Francis, son

6  

Amans, Lloyd, son

5  

Amans, Grace, daughter

3  

Amans, Leslie, son

1

 

 

     How do we know this is the right Mabel Amans?  Because it jibes with the 1930 census, which shows Mabel Amans divorced, with her parents, brothers, and two of the same children (Lloyd and Grace) as appeared ten years earlier:

1930 Census

Ward 3, Superior City, Douglas County, Wisconsin

Van Arman, Martha A., head

70

widowed

Van Arman, John G., son

42

single

Van Arman, W. Fitch, son

32

single

Van Arman, Robert A., son

27

single

Amans, Mabel A., daughter

47

divorced, first married age 21

Amans, Lloyd A., grandson

15

father b. Germany

Amans, Grace M, granddaughter

13

father b. Germany

Amans, Carol R., granddaughter

9

father b. Germany

Amans, Robert S., grandson

11

father b. Germany

 

     Thus we discovered that Hazel had eight siblings!  Three sisters (Nellie, Grace, & Carol) and five brothers (Edward G., Harry, Frances, Lloyd, & Robert S.).  Who knew??  Let's list these siblings in their order of birth:

Children of Edward and Mabel Amons, 1901-1921, Douglas Co WI

Nellie E. Amons  (f)

b. 1901

Hazel M. Amons  (f)

b. 1903

Edward G. Amons  (m)

b. 1906

Harry Amons  (m)

b. 1912

Francis Amons  (m)

b. 1914

Lloyd Amons  (m)

b. 1915

Grace Amons  (f)

b. 1917

Robert S. Amons  (m)

b. 1919

[Leslie Amons  (m) *

b. 1919]

Carol Amons  (f)

b.

1921


Note:  all of these children except Leslie are listed in Mabel Amons' divorce complaint of December 1922; thus Leslie must have died between summer 1920 and December 1922, leaving Hazel with eight siblings.

 

     Mabel Van Arman must have married Edward Amons around 1901, the year of Nellie's birth, and stayed married to him until 1920 or 1921 at least, according to the data we've gathered so far.  Her divorce must've been between 1920 and 1930.  So we inquired with the Douglas County Clerk's Office, and sure enough her divorce papers still exist. 

     They show that Mabel and Edward were married on June 30, 1900, and that Mabel filed for divorce in 1922 alleging willful desertion, but never followed through with the paperwork.  Excerpts from her complaint for divorce are reproduced after Hazel & Harold's divorce papers.  Her complaint lists these nine children (all except Leslie, as noted above).  It also offers an exact description of the parcel of land that comprised the Amons farm.  And, an interesting version of Mabel's signature.

     So it turns out that Hazel was a farmer's daughter, the second of nine siblings, and that her father deserted her family in 1920, just as she was coming into adulthood.  Soon after this she must have moved to St Paul MN, where she met and married Harold Schroeder, nine years her senior.

     All of this is confirmed in the Minnesota Historical Society's Death Index online, which shows that she died on 26 May 1996 (Hazel M. Overwick, mother's maiden name Van Arman, b. 18 Sept 1903, d. 26 May 1996 in Anoka County, cert. no. 021009, record no. 2713029; the Social Security Death Index says her last residence was Minneapolis, SSN 473-26-6755).  

     This means Hazel lived to age 92, and almost outlived her son Harry, who died in June 2002 at age 76.

     For Hazel's sister Nellie E. Omans we find an online entry in the Wisconsin Historical Society for a girl b. 5 Oct 1901 in Douglas Co WI.  So of course Mike sent in the $15 for her birth certificate, from which he learned that the baby girl's full name was Nellie Engelina Omans, born at 1 a.m. on Oct 5, 1901 in West Superior, Douglas Co WI, to father Ed. Omans, a laborer born in Germany, and mother Mabel Veresman, born in Wisconsin.  Nellie was their first child.  (The midwife's name was Mrs. A. Bakka, and the birth was registered on Nov 5, 1901.)

     (We would post an image of the birth certificate here, but there's a red stamp on it that warns that it is illegal to make this document available to the public in electronic format, which is enough to give pause, though why on Earth posting this public, non-copyrighted document from the early years of the last century would be illegal is quite beyond us.  On the other hand the red stamp says nothing about making portions of the document available to the public in electronic format, and given our penchant for pushing the boundaries of copyright law and fair use doctrine at every opportunity (an idea Google stole from us!), we reproduce an electronic scan of Nellie's full name below:)

From the birth certificate of Nellie Engelina Omans, born 5 Oct 1901, birth registered 5 Nov 1901 in Douglas County, WI, reel 56, record no. 199, Wisconsin Historical Society

 

     There is no record of Hazel's birth in Wisconsin, at least that we could find after a thorough search of the Wisconsin Historical Society online index, which has complete county records up to 1907; there is an unnamed Amons, b. Douglas Co 1907, and an unnamed Oman b. 26 June 1904, which are the closest we could find (the latter might be Hazel, the registration made 15 months or so after her birth).  Nor is there a record of her mother Mabel's marriage to Edward Amons, at least in Wisconsin.  For some reason -- maybe because they were farmers -- all these events were flying under the vital statistics radar screen.

     One thing seems clear from all this:  Hazel evidently had a pretty unstable childhood and early family life.  We do not know where she lived or who raised her; we have no contemporaneous record of her until 1920, when she's in her late teens and living with her sister, maternal grandparents, and three uncles.  Yet her family life was not wholly dysfunctional; she was still part of her extended family, and she remained close enough to her sister Nell and Uncle Robert for them to witness her wedding in January 1923.  That the wedding was held in Duluth also suggests continuing family ties to the area.  Finally, we've opened up another can of worms with these Van Arman, Pollard, and Amons ancestral lines.  Who knows where those will lead?

  

The best photo we have of Hazel Mae Schroeder Overwick, summer 1973, taken by her son Harry Jr. at his home in St Paul; half a dozen such shots were taken, seemingly from as far a distance as possible.  On the right escorting Hazel through the backyard drink in hand, Diplomat Extraordinaire Betty Schroeder)

 

     These contexts established, and bearing in mind what we've learned about Hazel's ancestry, family life, and early years, we turn to Harold & Hazel's depressing, redundant, and revealing divorce file.   (All documents dated 24 April 1939)

    

The Documents   

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF RAMSEY

DISTRICT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Harold F. Schroeder, Plaintiff,

vs.

Hazel M. Schroeder, Defendant.

DECREE

 

     Pursuant to the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment, made and entered herein on the 24th day of April, 1939, and upon motion of Lewis E. Lohman, attorney for the plaintiff.

     IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff be, and he is, hereby granted an absolute divorce from the defendant, and that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant be, and they are, hereby in all things forever dissolved.

     1.  It is further ordered that the plaintiff, Harold F. Schroeder, is hereby awarded the custody of the two minor children of the plaintiff and defendant, to-wit:  Betty Jean Schroeder, 15 years of age, and Harold F. Schroeder, Jr., 12 years of age, with the right of reasonable visitation on the part of the defendant at least twice a month, the defendant to notify the plaintiff as to such times as she wishes to see and visit with the children, and the further right to have the custody of the children for two weeks out of each year during the summer months.

     2.  It is further ordered that the present home of the plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein, described as "Lot 28, Block 7, Lane's Manor Addition to the City of St. Paul, also known as No. 1411 Randolph Street in said city", now held by the said parties as joint tenants and not as tenants in common, is hereby decreed and awarded to the plaintiff, and the defendant is divested of all interest in said premises.  In the event of sale of said premises by the plaintiff, half of the proceeds of said sale are to be placed in trust in the savings department of a regular bank in the State of Minnesota in equal shares for said minor children for distribution to said children at such times as they reach their majority.  If said children are minors at the time of said sale, or in the event of the death of the plaintiff herein, said minor children shall receive a fourth interest in said premises.  In the event one of said children precedes the plaintiff in death, then the survivor shall receive a half interest in said premises.

    3.  It is further ordered that all household furniture of the parties herein is hereby decreed to the plaintiff except one wash machine, one tea set, one breakfast set, one end table, one bridge lamp, one telephone stand, and the personal dishes of the defendant, which personal property is decreed and awarded to the defendant.

     By the Court:

     /s/  N. C. Robinson, Clerk of the District Court

     Approved as to form:

     /s/  J ----- E. Michael   Dated at Saint Paul, Minnesota, this 24th day of April, 1939.

 

 

 

STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF RAMSEY

DISTRICT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Harold F. Schroeder, Plaintiff,

vs.

Hazel M. Schroeder, Defendant

FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

 

     The above entitled matter, being on the general term calendar of this Court, came on for trail before the undersigned, one of the judges of said Court, without a jury, and was heard on the 24th day of April, 1939.

     Lewis E. Lohmann, Esq., appeared as attorney for the plaintiff and there was no appearance by or on behalf of the defendant save and except a stipulation on file herein.

     The Court having heard all of the evidence adduced by and on behalf of the plaintiff, and the Court having jurisdiction of both the parties and of the subject matter of this action, and being fully advised in the premises, makes the following

FINDINGS OF FACT

     1.  That the plaintiff and defendant were married in the City of Duluth, County of St. Louis, State of Minnesota, on the 18th day of January, 1923, and ever since that date have been and now are husband and wife.

     2.  That the plaintiff's name is Harold F. Schroeder, and that he is 44 years of age; that the defendant's name is Hazel M. Schroeder and that she is 34 years of age.

     3.  That there is living as issue of said marriage, two children, namely:  Betty Jean Schroeder, 15 years of age, and Harold F. Schroeder, Jr., 12 years of age.

     4.  That the plaintiff has resided in the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota, for more than one year immediately preceding the commencement of this action and the filing of the complaint herein.

     5.  That on or about the 23rd day of April, 1937, defendant willfully deserted the plaintiff and has ever since said date and for more than one year immediately preceding the commencement of this action, uninterruptedly continued said desertion without cause on the part of this plaintiff.

     6.  That the parties have filed a stipulation herein as follows:

     "IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to the above entitled action, subject to the approval of the Court and such modifications as the Court may see fit to make,

    1.  That the plaintiff, Harold F. Schroeder, shall be given the custody of the two minor children of the plaintiff and defendant  . . . [see DECREE, no. 1, above]

     2.  That the present home of the plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein, described as "Lot 28 . . ."  [see DECREE, no. 2, above]

     3.  All household furniture . . . [see DECREE, no. 3, above].

     It is further stipulated and agreed that the within may constitute the basis of an order to be made by the Court as to the custody of the minor children of the parties herein, and as to a property distribution," the terms of which the Court approves.

     The Court finds as

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

     1.  That the plaintiff herein is entitled to judgment awarding him an absolute divorce from the defendant and forever dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff and defendant.

     2.  That the plaintiff, Harold F. Schroeder, shall be given the custody of the two minor children of the plaintiff and defendant, to-wit:  [see DECREE, no. 1, above].

     3.  That the present home of the plaintiff and minor children of the parties herein, described as "Lot 28 . . . [see DECREE, no. 2, above].

     4.  All household furniture of the parties herein . . . [see DECREE, no. 3, above].

    LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

     /s/ James E. Michael, District Judge

     Dated April 24, 1939

 

 

Supplementary Documents:    Hazel's Mother's divorce complaint

 

Divorce Complaint of Mabel Emmons (Amons)

December 1922


STATE OF WISCONSIN, SUPERIOR COURT, DOUGLAS COUNTY

 

Mabel Emmons, Plaintiff

vs.

Edward Emmons, Defendant

     The above-named plaintiff by E. S. Geraldson, her attorney, complains of the above named defendant and for a cause of action alleges and shows to the court;

     1.  That the parties hereto were married on the 30th day of June, 1900, at Superior, Wisconsin, and ever since have been and are now husband and wife.

     2.  That the plaintiff now is and for more than two years next immediately preceding the commencement of this action has been an actual bona-fide resident of Douglas County, Wisconsin; ...

     4.  That the following children are issue of said marriage, Nellie, aged 21, Hazel aged 19, Edward aged 17, Harry aged 12, Francis aged 10, Lloyed aged 8, Grace aged 6, Robert aged 4, Carrol aged 2 years;

     5.  That although the plaintiff has always conducted herself toward the defendant as a faithful and obedient wife, the defendant disregarding his duties as a husband, on or about the 4th day of December, 1920, willfully deserted the plaintiff, and ever since said time, and for more than one year preceding the commencement of this action, uninterruptedly continued said desertion without cause on the part of this plaintiff;

     6.  That this plaintiff has no property of her own but that she together with her children live on a farm which farm is in the name of her husband and is described as follows; the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 47, Range 13, Douglas County, Wisconsin; that at the time the defendant deserted this plaintiff he also left some personal property, which personal property and farm this plaintiff has used for the support, care, maintenance and education of the children of the parties hereto;

     Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment;

     That the bonds of matrimony existing between the plaintiff and the defendant be wholly dissolved;

     That the plaintiff be adjudged such division of estate for the support, care, maintenance and education of the minor children of the parties hereto as the court shall deem just and equitable;

     That she have her costs and disbursements and for such other and further relief as may be just and equitable.

     /s/  E. S. Geraldson, Plaintiff's attorney


[Note:  The court was unable to serve the complaint and summons on the defendant Edward Amons because they couldn't find him in the state; the court then ordered the complaint to be published in the Superior Telegram for six consecutive weeks in late 1922 and early 1923.  The Superior County Clerk's office has no record of the completion of this divorce action, suggesting that Mabel never filed all the necessary papers, although the 1930 census shows her divorced.]

 

Above:  signature of Mabel Amons; the divorce papers spelled her name "Mabel Emmons," and evidently she first signed her name "Mable Amons," then was told by her attorney that the documents all spelled her name "Emmons" and she needed to change it, so she did; from an affidavit testifying to the truth of her divorce complaint, 27 November 1922.

 

 

Top of Page

 

Next Chapter:

Schroeder & Peanuts

 

 

Home     Contents     Documents Home     People